Skip to content

Add GitHub Sponsors funding file#1

Open
buildrr89 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
codex/add-sponsor-button
Open

Add GitHub Sponsors funding file#1
buildrr89 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
codex/add-sponsor-button

Conversation

@buildrr89
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@buildrr89 buildrr89 commented Apr 5, 2026 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Scope

  • add repository funding config for GitHub Sponsors

Non-scope

  • no runtime, API, or workflow changes
  • no documentation changes

Proof

  • gh api graphql ... sponsorsListing ... -> sponsorsListing returned non-null for buildrr89
  • ruby -e "require 'yaml'; p YAML.load_file('.github/FUNDING.yml')" -> {"github"=>"buildrr89"}

Notes

  • GitHub sponsor button is driven by .github/FUNDING.yml on the default branch.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enabled GitHub Sponsors funding display on the repository.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 5, 2026 •
edited
Loading

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7271e190-a3c5-4de6-8dc6-7c9e3596fe70

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d577d18 and 5d19978.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/FUNDING.yml
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A GitHub Sponsors funding configuration file was added to the repository, specifying a GitHub Sponsors handle to enable funding information display on the repository page.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
GitHub Funding Configuration
.github/FUNDING.yml		 Added GitHub Sponsors funding handle to enable repository funding information display.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A sponsor link so neat and fine,
Built into this codebase divine,
With buildrr89 on display,
Support can flourish, come what may! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ❓ Inconclusive The description covers key sections (Scope, Non-scope, Proof, Notes) but omits several required template sections like Problem, Why now, Acceptance criteria, Docs updated, Verification, and others. Consider whether to expand the description to fill missing template sections or clarify which sections are intentionally inapplicable to this metadata-only change.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely summarizes the main change: adding a GitHub Sponsors funding configuration file to the repository.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/add-sponsor-button

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Apr 5, 2026

RADE score diff

Compared d577d18082e8ae6284ba1014b7c030c7101b4a63 -> 5d199787a49d98f48ca79556701ac286189107cb.
Regression gate status: disabled.
Direction: higher reusability is better; lower accessibility_risk is better.

Metric Base Head Delta
reusability 86 86 0
accessibility_risk 70 70 0

Generated by RADE GitHub Action.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@buildrr89